Thursday 13 June 2013

God as an absolute subject



The notion of God as substance was grounded in a view of the world as cosmos. God is placed at the centre of an ordered universe. With the rise of the scientific method, however, human persons begin to see themselves as at the centre of the world. As they gain more and more knowledge of how it works, they have the means of exerting a higher level of control over it. At this particular point the centre changes from supreme substance to a human subject.[1]
In this situation in which the human experiences herself as subject over against a world of objects, it is natural that those who believe in God would see the divine as an archetype of themselves. God is the infinite, perfect and absolute subject.[2] God is then seen as subject, with perfect reason and free will, and is in actual fact the archetype of the free, reasonable, sovereign person, who has complete disposal over himself.[3]
Seamands argues that if there is any doctrine relevant to our identity and calling as servants of God it is the doctrine of Trinity, because it defines the grammar of the Christian faith. It gives us the audacity to speak of God who is revealed as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit in the Scriptures as well as setting our Christian understanding of God apart from all others and makes it not merely theistic.[4]
Moltmann in his doctrine of Trinity is opposed to the idea of a ‘monotheistic’ or ‘monarchical’ doctrine of God because it reduces the real subjectivity of the three persons. He argues that the doctrine of Trinity should be understood as providing a vision of God view as a union of three divine persons or distinct, but related subjects. Out of this he develops a social doctrine of the Trinity intended to overcome both monotheism in the concept of God and individualism in the doctrine of man into developing a social personalism and personalist socialism.[5] Moltmann follows the Eastern Cappadocian Fathers in developing their concept of Trinity but they both balance the threeness tendency of social Trinity by speaking of perichoresis.



[1] Moltmann, The Trinity and the Kingdom of God,13
[2] Moltmann, The Trinity and the Kingdom of God, 13
[3] Moltmann, The Trinity and the Kingdom of God, 15
[4] Seamands, Ministry in the Image of God, 11
[5] Alister E. McGrath. Christian Theology: An Introduction (Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 258

No comments:

Post a Comment