Martin Luther and other reformation leaders argues that by design the Christian church had never
adopted the view that the authority of the scriptures was to be found in its
incomprehensibility. The most that the Christian Church had ever claimed was
that Christianity was restricted to the three languages of Greek, Latin and Hebrew
because ostensibly those were the languages
used in the inscription on the cross at the crucifixion of Jesus. Since
it was pirate who gave these instructions for the orders ,the tri-lingual case
was ironic at best. Accordingly with Pirate as its ally the church had cause to
worry about championing tri-lingual case. In the end it was the missionary
enterprise that blew the case away. This happened long before the reformation
when Constantine in Verona responded…….Does God not reign on all equally
and do we not breath in the same way and are you not ashamed to mentioned only
3 languages and to command all other nations and tribes to be deaf and blind?...
These have been some of the reflections running through my
mind in my recent research on the Concept of God among some communities in Kenya. When missionaries
arrived anywhere and embarked on Bible translation one of the most fundamental
questions they asked without preparing for the implications of the question ‘What
name do you people call God’. I would
imagine that as a startling question to ask in the setting of missions. If
missions was a ready-made package then it could arrive in the field set down
and deployed. Missions would be a way of people coming to Christianity rather
than Christianity to the people. By asking this fundamental question, what name
do you call God?’ , without realizing missions changes the dynamic of the
relationship. The Indigenous concept of God was central and indispensable to
Bible translations. Without it, the enterprise was doomed if at all
conceivable. The early missionaries clearly understood that the concept of God existed independently
of them though few understood what implications that would bring. It was and
will never be possible to talk about Christianity without talking about the
concept of God. Arrival of Christianity anywhere is a delayed homecoming. Vincent
Donovan a catholic missionary among the Maasai vindicate the idea of the Gospel
being anticipated. After serving among the Maasai for a period of seven years
Vincent thought that the church opposition to local culture as pagan and
heathen was wrong-headed. It was not that the Maasai were proposing to depart
from Christian teaching but they were proposing to enter more deeply into it
and clearly it is impossible for them or
anyone else to accept a gospel which is given to them half-heartedly by missionaries
in a whole-hearted manner. Donovan point at a Maasai creed where they speak in
their creed as a believing community and not as isolated persons. And instead
of casting their creed on cognitive abstract terms of seen and unseen, of
Christ as eternally begotten from the Father and so on , the Maasai speak of a
journey of Faith in a God who out of love created the world and everyone in it.
How they one new this God in darkness and now knew this God in the light…The
creed continues…with God promises in the scripture in history and momentously in
Christ. A man in the fresh, Jew by tribe, born poor in a village, who left his
home and was always on safari doing good, curing people by the power of God
until finally He was rejected by His people, tortured and nailed hands and feet
to a cross and died. The irony of historic Jesus is clinched with astounding statement with words…He laid
buried in the grave but hyena did not touch Him and on the third day He rose
from the grave. The creed ends with an eschatological message of joy and hope….We
are waiting for Jesus, He is alive, He lives this we believe. The Jesus of the
African creed is a solid historical figure, he is rooted in his Jewish culture,
swept up in the controversies of the day, put to death without been ashamed,
witnessed too by scriptures and all histories . This Jesus is not smothered in cultural
conceits. The Maasai don’t think of their faith as a strategies against their
enemies but their creed resounds with gratitude and God honour. The whole point
of their creed is not that it should be a study document of the scholars but a
testament of faith and devotion for believers!
Thanks very much for this Gerald. Really thought-provoking stuff. What I particularly like about the Maasai creed is how it is a story rather than abstract statements. I wonder whether this might be the most fruitful way forward in this discussion of the concept of God which can sometimes get bogged down in rather complex linguistic and philosophical arguments. The biblical answer to 'Who is God, what is he like?' seems most often to be 'Look at what he has done, read the story of his acts of love for his people through history - that is who he is.'
ReplyDeleteThat is very true Andy. Our theology should be simple and understable to all! Missionaries should have been very pleased when they came upon evidence that God had preceded them, that Christianity was anticipated and the local people possessed faith in reality of God. More than that the willingness of the local people to receive the gospel should have delighted the missionaries and given them heart that the scripture was being confirmed, that among all people that God had not been without a witness even when many nations walked in their own ways as echoed in Romans about justification…God’s absolute sovereign and transcendent impartiality towards all cultures. Instead many missionaries seemed shocked and disappointed even antagonised by examples of faithfulness, endurance and forgiveness standards by which they were purporting to do missions. Missions was therefore adamant about discounting and contesting any evidence of God prior presence.
ReplyDelete