Friday 20 July 2012

Concept of God among some African communities


Martin Luther and other reformation leaders argues  that by design the Christian church had never adopted the view that the authority of the scriptures was to be found in its incomprehensibility. The most that the Christian Church had ever claimed was that Christianity was restricted to the three languages of Greek, Latin and Hebrew because ostensibly those were the languages  used in the inscription on the cross at the crucifixion of Jesus. Since it was pirate who gave these instructions for the orders ,the tri-lingual case was ironic at best. Accordingly with Pirate as its ally the church had cause to worry about championing tri-lingual case. In the end it was the missionary enterprise that blew the case away. This happened long before the reformation when  Constantine in Verona  responded…….Does God not reign on all equally and do we not breath in the same way and are you not ashamed to mentioned only 3 languages and to command all other nations  and tribes to be deaf and blind?...
These have been some of the reflections running through my mind in my recent research on the Concept of God among  some communities in Kenya. When missionaries arrived anywhere and embarked on Bible translation one of the most fundamental questions they asked without preparing for the implications of the question ‘What name do you people call God’.  I would imagine that as a startling question to ask in the setting of missions. If missions was a ready-made package then it could arrive in the field set down and deployed. Missions would be a way of people coming to Christianity rather than Christianity to the people. By asking this fundamental question, what name do you call God?’ , without realizing missions changes the dynamic of the relationship. The Indigenous concept of God was central and indispensable to Bible translations. Without it, the enterprise was doomed if at all conceivable. The early missionaries clearly understood  that the concept of God existed independently of them though few understood what implications that would bring. It was and will never be possible to talk about Christianity without talking about the concept of God. Arrival of Christianity anywhere is a delayed homecoming. Vincent Donovan a catholic missionary among the Maasai vindicate the idea of the Gospel being anticipated. After serving among the Maasai for a period of seven years Vincent thought that the church opposition to local culture as pagan and heathen was wrong-headed. It was not that the Maasai were proposing to depart from Christian teaching but they were proposing to enter more deeply into it and clearly  it is impossible for them or anyone else to accept a gospel which is given to them half-heartedly by missionaries in a whole-hearted manner. Donovan point at a Maasai creed where they speak in their creed as a believing community and not as isolated persons. And instead of casting their creed on cognitive abstract terms of seen and unseen, of Christ as eternally begotten from the Father and so on , the Maasai speak of a journey of Faith in a God who out of love created the world and everyone in it. How they one new this God in darkness and now knew this God in the light…The creed continues…with God promises in the scripture in history and momentously in Christ. A man in the fresh, Jew by tribe, born poor in a village, who left his home and was always on safari doing good, curing people by the power of God until finally He was rejected by His people, tortured and nailed hands and feet to a cross and died. The irony of historic Jesus is clinched  with astounding statement with words…He laid buried in the grave but hyena did not touch Him and on the third day He rose from the grave. The creed ends with an eschatological message of joy and hope….We are waiting for Jesus, He is alive, He lives this we believe. The Jesus of the African creed is a solid historical figure, he is rooted in his Jewish culture, swept up in the controversies of the day, put to death without been ashamed, witnessed too by scriptures and all histories . This Jesus is not smothered in cultural conceits. The Maasai don’t think of their faith as a strategies against their enemies but their creed resounds with gratitude and God honour. The whole point of their creed is not that it should be a study document of the scholars but a testament of faith and devotion for believers!

2 comments:

  1. Thanks very much for this Gerald. Really thought-provoking stuff. What I particularly like about the Maasai creed is how it is a story rather than abstract statements. I wonder whether this might be the most fruitful way forward in this discussion of the concept of God which can sometimes get bogged down in rather complex linguistic and philosophical arguments. The biblical answer to 'Who is God, what is he like?' seems most often to be 'Look at what he has done, read the story of his acts of love for his people through history - that is who he is.'

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is very true Andy. Our theology should be simple and understable to all! Missionaries should have been very pleased when they came upon evidence that God had preceded them, that Christianity was anticipated and the local people possessed faith in reality of God. More than that the willingness of the local people to receive the gospel should have delighted the missionaries and given them heart that the scripture was being confirmed, that among all people that God had not been without a witness even when many nations walked in their own ways as echoed in Romans about justification…God’s absolute sovereign and transcendent impartiality towards all cultures. Instead many missionaries seemed shocked and disappointed even antagonised by examples of faithfulness, endurance and forgiveness standards by which they were purporting to do missions. Missions was therefore adamant about discounting and contesting any evidence of God prior presence.

    ReplyDelete